Skip to main content
Elite Prosthetic Dentistry

How a Mistaken Implant Recommendation Was Resolved with Bite Correction and New Restorations

Bite rehabilitation before unnecessary implant surgery

Rebuilding the bite and replacing aging restorations in Washington, DC. This documented case at Elite Prosthetic Dentistry resolved a patient’s concerns without unnecessary implant surgery through a coordinated specialist treatment plan. Treatment was planned and completed by Dr. Gerald Marlin, D.M.D., M.S.D., a prosthodontist focused on comprehensive bite rehabilitation and specialist-level second-opinion care.

Case at a Glance

Treatment
Comprehensive bite rehabilitation and restoration redesign
Approach
Specialist second opinion, orthodontics, custom restorations, bite adjustment, sedation

Intraoral view

Before Before
Pre-treatment intraoral view showing the aging restorations and compromised bite.
After After
Final intraoral view after coordinated bite rehabilitation.

The presenting condition

The patient came in after being told she needed an implant for a root canal treated tooth with decay and resorption. A deeper specialist evaluation showed the situation was substantially different from a single failing tooth.

Clinical Findings

  • Bone loss from long-term grinding (periodontosis)
  • Inadequate bite with no proper occlusal guidance
  • No contact on the right side in centric or lateral movements
  • Early signs of moderate to severe TMJ involvement
  • Opaque, unnatural-looking existing veneers
  • Insufficient bone to predictably support a new implant

Why this case required prosthodontic-level planning

A general dentist recommending an implant for a failing tooth is not wrong in isolation. It is the surrounding context that matters. When the patient’s bite is collapsed, when the bone is compromised by years of unguided grinding, and when the veneers themselves are not behaving like a stable foundation, dropping an implant into that environment can lock in the underlying instability. A prosthodontic second opinion exists precisely for cases where the recommended treatment may be technically possible but is not the right answer for the whole mouth.

The treatment plan

  1. 1

    Specialist second opinion and full diagnostic workup

    Comprehensive evaluation including bite analysis, TMJ assessment, and imaging confirmed that the recommended implant was not the right next step.

  2. 2

    Orthodontic correction of the lower arch

    Treatment began with orthodontics to correct the lower teeth and create the alignment needed for a stable bite.

  3. 3

    Coordinated care with an orthodontic specialist

    Orthodontic work delivered in close coordination with the orthodontic specialist to ensure the lower-arch correction matched the planned restorative endpoint.

  4. 4

    Custom restorations and lower bridge

    Aging veneers replaced with custom crowns and a coordinated lower bridge designed to function with the corrected bite.

  5. 5

    Bite adjustment and protective night guard

    Final bite adjustments and a protective night guard to preserve the corrected occlusion and reduce wear from grinding.

  6. 6

    IV sedation for complex appointments

    Treatment delivered under IV sedation where appropriate, allowing the more complex appointments to be completed comfortably.

The outcome

The case moved from the patient came in after being told she needed an implant for a root canal treated tooth with decay and resorption to a stable, coordinated long-term result.

Result Highlights

  • Unnecessary implant surgery avoided through specialist diagnosis
  • Lower arch corrected through coordinated orthodontic work
  • Aging veneers replaced with custom restorations
  • Bite stabilized with adjustment and protective night guard
  • Functional and esthetic improvement delivered under one coordinated plan

Additional intraoral view

Before Before
Additional pre-treatment view documenting the extent of the bite and esthetic concerns.
After After
Additional final view after the coordinated rebuild.

Who this case may sound familiar to

This story tends to resonate with patients in a few recognizable situations:

  • You have been told you need an implant and you want to make sure that is actually the right answer.
  • Your bite does not feel right and the dentist’s plan does not seem to address that.
  • Your existing veneers are aging and you suspect the problem is bigger than just one tooth.
  • You have signs of grinding or TMJ involvement and you are tired of being treated tooth by tooth.
  • You want a specialist evaluation before committing to surgery.

If any of those describe where you are, a consultation with Dr. Marlin can establish the diagnostic picture and the specific options for your case.

Frequently asked questions

When is a second opinion useful before agreeing to an implant?

Whenever the recommendation involves significant surgery, when the failing tooth sits inside a larger bite problem, or when the supporting bone may not be ideal. A prosthodontic second opinion evaluates the whole occlusal system, not just the proposed surgical site.

Why does grinding affect implant decisions?

Long-term grinding can drive bone loss, change the bite, and alter the loading patterns that an implant relies on. Treating the grinding and bite alongside any implant decision protects both the new restoration and the rest of the dentition.

What is TMJ involvement and why does it matter here?

Temporomandibular joint dysfunction can manifest as bite changes, joint pain, muscle fatigue, or asymmetric loading. Cases that show early TMJ involvement often benefit from bite correction and protective splinting before any new fixed restorations are placed.

Why replace older veneers as part of bite correction?

Veneers placed against an unstable or collapsed bite will reproduce that instability. Replacing them within a corrected bite is what makes the new work stable for the long term.

Is sedation available for these longer appointments?

Yes. IV sedation is used routinely for the longer or more complex appointments that comprehensive bite rehabilitation requires.

More about the work behind this case

This case sits at the intersection of full mouth reconstruction, implant reconstruction, and complex restorative dentistry. The diagnostic depth and in-house laboratory control are part of the practice philosophy that supports cases of this complexity.

Elite Prosthetic Dentistry treats patients from across the DMV including Bethesda, Chevy Chase, McLean, Arlington, Potomac, and Great Falls, with a record of out-of-area patients traveling to the practice for complex restorative care.

See This in Action

Related Patient Success Stories

Explore similar patient success stories demonstrating our expertise in advanced prosthetic dentistry.

About the Provider

This case was treated by Dr. Marlin at Elite Prosthetic Dentistry in Washington, DC. Dr. Marlin is a prosthodontist with 40+ years of experience and 3,900+ dental implants placed. Elite maintains an in-house dental laboratory for custom-fabricated restorations.

4400 Jenifer Street NW, Suite 220, Washington, DC20015 • (202) 244-2101

Facing a Similar Situation?

If you're dealing with a complex dental challenge, Dr. Marlin and the Elite Prosthetic Dentistry team can help. With 40+ years of experience and 3,900+ implants placed and restored, the practice is built for cases that require specialist depth.

Nervous about dental procedures? Learn about our Sedation Guide and comfort options.